ggKbase home page

dasL2_047_000M1_metabat_metabat_73_fa_fa

L2_047_000M1_public_Ruminococcus_37_17
In projects: L2_047_000M1_public

Consensus taxonomy: Ruminococcus  →  Clostridiales  →  Clostridia  →  Firmicutes  →  Bacteria

Displaying items 51-69 of 69 in total
contig # features sequence size GC content (%) Cov Coding Density (%)
L2_047_000M1_scaffold_7943
Species: Lachnospiraceae bacterium 3_1_46FAA (71.43%)
7 8748 bp 36.58 10.97 81.17
L2_047_000M1_scaffold_3263
Genus: Ruminococcus (85.71%)
7 7244 bp 40.50 18.41 82.83
L2_047_000M1_scaffold_6021
Genus: Ruminococcus (71.43%)
7 7655 bp 32.46 14.28 81.24
L2_047_000M1_scaffold_8319
Genus: Ruminococcus (50%)
6 3598 bp 36.41 14.88 64.54
L2_047_000M1_scaffold_1923
Species: Ruminococcus champanellensis (50%)
6 11348 bp 40.26 19.26 87.50
L2_047_000M1_scaffold_8528
Phylum: Firmicutes (50%)
6 3526 bp 31.11 15.78 100.06
L2_047_000M1_scaffold_5860
Genus: Ruminococcus (60%)
5 4708 bp 37.51 14.82 68.56
L2_047_000M1_scaffold_4060 5 6221 bp 34.27 14.49 87.38
L2_047_000M1_scaffold_4578
Phylum: Firmicutes (60%)
5 5699 bp 35.44 19.87 88.65
L2_047_000M1_scaffold_5290
Order: Clostridiales (80%)
5 5111 bp 39.70 19.46 88.05
L2_047_000M1_scaffold_9064
Species: Ruminococcus sp. CAG:403 (50%)
4 5946 bp 37.13 19.00 79.72
L2_047_000M1_scaffold_12583
Species: Ruminococcus callidus (50%)
4 3501 bp 32.39 15.00 82.18
L2_047_000M1_scaffold_12339
Phylum: Firmicutes (50%)
4 2643 bp 36.74 46.99 96.94
L2_047_000M1_scaffold_2800
Domain: Bacteria (50%)
4 8238 bp 32.87 13.42 95.88
L2_047_000M1_scaffold_47260
Genus: Ruminococcus (50%)
4 2680 bp 36.98 43.15 91.57
L2_047_000M1_scaffold_11014
Class: Actinobacteria (66.67%)
3 2881 bp 32.07 17.96 91.84
L2_047_000M1_scaffold_9371
Species: Bacillus thuringiensis (100%)
2 3261 bp 29.99 22.91 74.52
L2_047_000M1_scaffold_10511
Species: Clostridium sp. ATCC 29733 (50%)
2 2989 bp 39.01 14.30 99.06
L2_047_000M1_scaffold_4855
Species: Lachnospiraceae bacterium 3-2 (50%)
2 5454 bp 27.98 22.14 95.21
Displaying items 51-69 of 69 in total

Ribosomal proteins shown here were identified using keyword searches of all annotations.

The SCGs are found by conducting USEARCH with a custom database.

The SCGs are found by conducting USEARCH with a custom database.